By the end of 2002, Russia’s narcological service
registered 449,000 drug users, including 323,000 diagnosed narcomania
and 126,000 drug abusers. A widely accepted estimate of drug users’ population
in Russia is about 3 million, i.e., 2-2.5% of the entire population.
Narcomania was spreading in the country
in the 1990s at very fast rates (Table 7), but over the past two years
there was a marked decline in the growth rate.
Table 7. Narcomania
incidence, Russia, 1995-2002
|
1995
|
1996
|
1997
|
1998
|
1999
|
2000
|
2001
|
2002
|
Patients
diagnosed with narcomania for the first time in their life, who
were placed under servaillance |
ths
people |
22.9
|
30.4
|
41.6
|
51.6
|
60.9
|
73.3
|
62.8
|
27.3
|
per
100,000 |
15.5
|
20.7
|
28.5
|
35.4
|
41.9
|
50.7
|
43.4
|
18.9
|
Registered
for preventive purposes because of drug abuse |
ths
people |
21.6
|
27
|
39.2
|
47
|
52.4
|
51.1
|
45.3
|
32.6
|
per
100,000 |
14.6
|
18.5
|
26.8
|
32.2
|
36.1
|
35.4
|
31.3
|
22.6
|
Registered
as narcomaniacs (year end) |
ths
people |
64.9
|
88.1
|
120.6
|
160
|
209.1
|
269.1
|
317.2
|
322.9
|
per
100,000 |
44
|
60.2
|
82.6
|
109.9
|
144.4
|
186.6
|
219.2
|
223.4
|
Registered
because of drug abuse (year end) |
ths
people |
41.7
|
52.8
|
72.4
|
93.1
|
122.2
|
125.9
|
130.9
|
125.8
|
per
100,000 |
28.3
|
36.1
|
49.6
|
64
|
84.4
|
87.3
|
90.5
|
87.0
|
Sources: Zdoroviye naseleniya
i deyatelnost uchrezhdeny zdravookhraneniya in 2001 godu. Stat. Materialy/
Minzdrav RF. M., 2002. Zdravookhraneniye v Rossii: Stat. sb./ Goskomstat
Rossii. M., 2001. Dannye Nationalnogo nauchnogo centra narkologii MZ RF
(The Population’s Health and the Activities of Health-Care Institutions
in 2001. Statistical Materials/ Russia’s Health Ministry. Moscow, 2002.
Health-Care in Russia: Collection of Statistics/ Russia’s State Statistics
Committee. Moscow, 2001. Data by the National Research Center on Addictions,
Russian Federation Ministry of Health).
The vast majority of those registered as narcomaniacs
use opioids, including heroin.
Table 8. Registered
narcomaniacs by the type of the drug, 2001, %
Opioids |
89.8
|
Cannabioids |
5.0
|
Cocaine |
0.1
|
Psychostimulants |
1.7
|
Other
drugs |
3.4
|
Source: Kirzhanova V.V. Communication
to the conference «AIDS in Russia: Trends, Factors and Consequences». FRMC
AIDS, CDHE NEFI RAS, CFDP, UNFPA. Moscow, March 19-20, 2003.
Fig. 1. Registered
narcomaniacs per 100,000 of population, by age, 2001
Source: Kirzhanova V.V. Communication
to the conference «AIDS in Russia: Trends, Factors and Consequences». FRMC
AIDS, CDHE NEFI RAS, CFDP, UNFPA. Moscow, March 19-20, 2003.
As can be seen from Figure 1, narcomania
is predominantly young people’s disease, with 18 - to 19-year-olds
making up a greatest number of those registered as narcomaniacs.
The experts, participated in the conference «AIDS
in Russia: Trends, Factors and Consequences» (Moscow, March 19-20, 2003)
held as part of the present project, suppose that causes of a recent decrease
in the number of registered drug abusers may be attributed to different
forces: drugs have begun to go out of fashion among adolescents (giving
preference to alcohol), stronger efforts against drug traffic resulted
in shortages of drugs (heroin, in particular), and faults in the operation
of national narcological service, being a reason for drug users to avoid
of state narcological service’s help in favor of private doctors’ anonymous
treatment.
Injecting Drug
Users
Since 1996 in Russia IDU is both the major engine
and the fuel of epidemic, virus penetration into this community was the
very launch of HIV epidemic.
The IDU group does not coincide with either the
group of registered drug abusers or narcomaniacs, being much larger. A
part of the group fully drops out of observation, but due to a definite
effect of injecting drugs, among which heroin is most widely used, on the
human organismremaining unobserved is rather temporal.
Attempts were made in several regions of Russia
to estimate the ratio of the registered and hidden (non-registered) drug
users. For example, the estimate made by means of a nomination method in
Moscow in 1998 showed that there were seven hidden users per one registered
by a narcological service. According to the estimate made by means of a
capture-recapture technique (city of Chapayevsk, Samara Region), the ratio
of the registered and hidden drug users was 1 to 3, thus the total number
of drug users in Chapayevsk was estimated at 3% of the entire population.
It should be kept in mind, however, that both the Samara Region and Moscow
are among the areas where the spread of narcomania is at a highest
level. In addition, the regions of Russia differ by a degree of attractiveness
of narcological services (the frequency of applying for help depends upon
it), the level of law-enforcement agencies’ operation efficiency, etc.
Moreover, the methods that were used have significant shortcomings, and
it would be incorrect to apply the obtained estimates to the entire population
of Russia.
The main features of IDUs’ behavior that result
in their contamination with HIV are the use of unsterile instruments for
drug injection, and in Russia these are often not only a common syringe
or needle, like is the case in foreign countries, but a common drug container
or a common water container for washing a syringe, after drug is used,
or common filters. Besides, in Russia there is a risk of being infected
through drug solution containing HIV. A very rapid spread of HIV infection
among IDUs can be attributed to these features.
Nearly 120,000 HIV-infected IDUs had been officially
registered in Russia by the start of 2003, and it is assumed that another
90,000 HIV-infected contracted the virus through the use of drugs.
The screening testing of the IDUs group revealed
6% HIV+ in 2001, and 3% - in 2002. As described above, a decrease in the
percentage of HIV+ cases in 2002 was probably not true but more likely
represented an annual increase in the percentage of infected in this group.
The true HIV prevalence among the group in 2002 may stand at about 17%.
This figure corresponds better with the findings
of sample surveys among IDUs in the territories of Russia. According to
sentinel epidemiological surveillance data of 2000-2002, 6% of IDUs is
HIV+ in Novosivirsk, 56% - in Tolyatti, and as much as 64.5% - in Irkutsk.
However, the sentinel surveillance data are available only for large cities
of the regions where HIV prevalence is above average. HIV prevalence of
the entire population is undoubtedly at a lower level. After summing up
the official annual indicators of HIV-detected cases among IDUs in the
regions where the above-mention cities are located, the results were as
follows: 1.2% of drug abusers are HIV-infected in the Novosibirsk Region,
29.7% - in the Samara Region, and 39.1% in the Irkutsk Region. According
to the FRMC AIDS experts, these indicators are most representative. There
are no HIV+ IDUs up to now in many territories of the country. The saturation
of the epidemic in IDU community should not be ignored. Even among drug
users the percentage of HIV-infected has never reached 100 and generally
comes to the level of 60-80%. The percentage of HIV-infected drug abusers
in some of the cities in Russia has already approached this number. Thus,
a further increase in the percentage of HIV-infected among IDU will be
unlikely.
|